PART 11 — THE MSS SEEDS (THE TWO IMPOSSIBLE QUESTIONS)

For anyone attempting to build a theory beyond MET

---

11.1. Seed I — The MSS Origin Test

(The challenge to create a theory without MET’s machinery)

> **“Construct a model of existence
without using:
– oscillation,
– differentiation,
– reflection,
or any mechanism that relies on them.

You must define a new foundational unit,
and from that unit, build an entire universe.”**

Rules of the Test

1. No simple analogies
No water, no sand piles, no cellular automata.

2. No borrowing spatial logic
You may not use distance, direction, above/below, within/without.

3. No invoking time
“Before”, “after”, “change”, “evolve”, “emerge” are all prohibited.

4. One primitive only
You may introduce exactly one fundamental principle.

5. From that single principle
You must produce: – multiplicity
– relation
– coherence
– and a universe-like structure

6. If you introduce a second principle, you fail
Because two principles = differentiation → violation of rule 1.

Purpose of the Seed

This seed exists to test:

the creativity of the theorist

the minimality of their metaphysics

whether a universe can be built without MET’s framework

This question does not ask for a correct answer.
It asks whether the reader can even escape MET’s machinery without accidentally recreating it.

---

11.2. Seed II — The State of Indeterminacy (Vô Định)

(The challenge that should be impossible to solve)

> **“Assume a state of Indeterminacy:
– no accumulation,
– no oscillation,
– no distinction,
– no structure,
– no time,
– no potential,
– no ability to give rise to anything.

From this state, produce something
without violating any of the above conditions.”**

Rules of the Test

1. If you name it → you fail.
Naming implies distinction.

2. If you describe it → you fail.
Description implies structure.

3. If you add a mechanism → you fail.
Mechanism implies causality or change.

4. If you say “it becomes…” → you fail.
Becoming implies time.

5. If you introduce potential → you fail.
Potential is already a form of existence.

6. If you introduce ‘nothingness’ → you also fail.
“Nothingness” is a conceptual differentiation from “something”.

Purpose of the Seed

The Indeterminacy Test is a philosophical singularity:

It cannot be answered

It cannot be meaningfully described

It exposes the boundary of human conceptual capacity

It is the “anti-axiom” of MET

The goal is not to solve it but to see how far a thinker can go before:

slipping into contradiction

accidentally creating differentiation

accidentally introducing time

accidentally recreating MET itself

Most will fail in the first sentence.

---

11.3. Final Remark — Why these two seeds exist

MET is complete only when its outer walls are drawn.

These two questions serve as:

the guardrails of the theory

the philosophical horizon that MET acknowledges but does not cross

the sandbox for future thinkers who want to explore beyond MET

They represent:

the limit of metaphysics

the edge of conceptualization

the point where thinking collapses into silent structure

Because:

> A theory becomes real not when it answers everything,
but when it clearly marks what cannot be answered.